aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/mod/mod-ci-github.cxx
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorFrancois Kritzinger <francois@codesynthesis.com>2024-05-17 14:37:30 +0200
committerFrancois Kritzinger <francois@codesynthesis.com>2024-06-05 09:12:46 +0200
commit74f9d2d1705e5b31ec1ed6550d3f9b13d2dce964 (patch)
treeff494d1a9991a27a864740fc37a54b44aa601063 /mod/mod-ci-github.cxx
parent3e83fda0f4e7f2014c91a6eb798bc66efd47743b (diff)
Plan pull request handling
Diffstat (limited to 'mod/mod-ci-github.cxx')
-rw-r--r--mod/mod-ci-github.cxx123
1 files changed, 117 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/mod/mod-ci-github.cxx b/mod/mod-ci-github.cxx
index 6816e5a..b9a8271 100644
--- a/mod/mod-ci-github.cxx
+++ b/mod/mod-ci-github.cxx
@@ -338,12 +338,10 @@ namespace brep
return true;
}
}
- else if (event == "pull_request")
- {
- // @@ TODO
-
- throw invalid_request (501, "pull request events not implemented yet");
- }
+ // else if (event == "pull_request")
+ // {
+ // return handle_pull_request ();
+ // }
else
{
// Log to investigate.
@@ -410,6 +408,119 @@ namespace brep
return true;
}
+ // High-level description of PR handling:
+ //
+ // - CI the merge commit but add checks to PR head ref
+ //
+ // Recommended by the following blog posts by a GitHub employee who is one
+ // of the best sources on these topics:
+ // https://www.kenmuse.com/blog/shared-commits-and-github-checks/ and
+ // https://www.kenmuse.com/blog/creating-github-checks/.
+ //
+ // DO NOT ADD CHECKS TO THE MERGE COMMIT because:
+ //
+ // - The PR head ref is the only commit that can be relied upon to exist
+ // throughout the PR's lifetime. The merge commit, on the other hand,
+ // can get replaced during the PR process. When that happens the PR will
+ // look for checks on the new merge commit, effectively discarding the
+ // ones we had before.
+ //
+ // - Although some of the GitHub documentation makes it sound like they
+ // expect checks to be added to both the PR head and the merge commit,
+ // the PR UI does not react to the merge commit's checks
+ // consistently. It actually seems to be quite broken.
+ //
+ // The only thing it seems to do reliably is blocking the PR merge if
+ // the merge commit is not successful (overriding the PR head ref's
+ // checks). But the UI looks quite messed up generally in this state.
+ //
+ // - PR Creation
+ //
+ // False green window problem
+ // - User creates new commit on feature branch
+ // - We receive check_suite; check runs start, run, succeed
+ // - User creates PR from feature branch to master
+ // - Because feature branch head has successful CRs, PR is green to merge
+ // - But merge commit has not been CI'd yet
+ // - False green until first merge commit CR is queued
+ //
+ // check_suite(requested, PR_head): [shared repo model]
+ //
+ // - Starts CI with check runs on what will become the PR head ref
+ //
+ // pull_request(opened)
+ //
+ // - Fetch pull request to trigger start of merge commit job; ignore
+ // response
+ //
+ // - To close false green window
+ // - if pull_request.head.repo.node_id == pull_request.base.repo.node_id
+ // - Replace all (or just one?) of the CRs on the PR head ref with new,
+ // queued ones
+ // - Fetch all check runs on PR head SHA
+ // - Find CRs with this PR in pull_requests[]
+ // - Create new CRs with same names as existing, thus effectively
+ // destroying the old ones
+ //
+ // - Create unloaded tenant
+ //
+ // - On callback
+ // Fetch pull request; if mergeable, start CI proper
+ //
+ // - New commits are added to PR head branch
+ //
+ // False green window
+ //
+ // PR already exists so merge will be red initially after CS is
+ // received, but those CRs could theoretically all succeed before our CI
+ // of the merge commit starts. Either way the CS CRs are an inaccurate
+ // representation of what's being CI'd so need to be avoided if
+ // possible.
+ //
+ // check_suite(requested, PR_head) [shared repo model]
+ //
+ // Ignore if pull_requests[] is non-empty (which should be the case if
+ // the head branch is in the same repository).
+ //
+ // pull_request(synchronize)
+ //
+ // - Fetch pull request to trigger start of merge commit job; ignore
+ // response
+ //
+ // - Create unloaded tenant
+ //
+ // - On callback
+ // Fetch pull request; if mergeable, start CI proper
+ //
+ // - New commits are added to PR base branch
+ //
+ // check_suite(requested, PR_base)
+ //
+ // Fetch all open PRs for base branch (triggering the merge commit jobs)
+ //
+ // Replace CRs on PR head refs to close false green window.
+ //
+ // Submit new unloaded tenants for all of the PRs.
+ //
+ // NOTE: pull_request.base.sha does not change. But merge commit (once
+ // updated) does try to merge PR head to new tip of PR base.
+ //
+ // - PR closed/merged/etc. @@ TODO
+ //
+ // pull_request(closed/merged/...)
+ //
+ // Note: when a PR is merged we will get a pull_request(closed) and then a
+ // check_suite for the base branch.
+ //
+ // bool ci_github::
+ // handle_pull_request (gh_pull_request_event pr)
+ // {
+ // // Fetch pull request in order to start job creating test merge
+ // // commit. Discard result.
+ // //
+ // // Start unloaded CI job.
+ // }
+
// Build state change notifications (see tenant-services.hxx for
// background). Mapping our state transitions to GitHub pose multiple
// problems: