aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/build2/install/rule.cxx
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorBoris Kolpackov <boris@codesynthesis.com>2018-02-05 12:02:32 +0200
committerBoris Kolpackov <boris@codesynthesis.com>2018-02-05 12:02:32 +0200
commit1bb564a690e2661094e9071d4003638390a5a6fe (patch)
tree48ed8eedb1f87fd05eb66547c12349bb3db92c2b /build2/install/rule.cxx
parent7005f1f5b525705fa3fd458a840d027046a2085b (diff)
Fix test and install rules to handle see-through groups correctly
Diffstat (limited to 'build2/install/rule.cxx')
-rw-r--r--build2/install/rule.cxx61
1 files changed, 47 insertions, 14 deletions
diff --git a/build2/install/rule.cxx b/build2/install/rule.cxx
index 4d4cb51..2b5d048 100644
--- a/build2/install/rule.cxx
+++ b/build2/install/rule.cxx
@@ -53,9 +53,16 @@ namespace build2
}
const target* alias_rule::
- filter (action, const target& t, prerequisite_member p) const
+ filter (action a, const target& t, prerequisite_iterator& i) const
{
- return &p.search (t);
+ assert (i->target == nullptr);
+ return filter (a, t, i->prerequisite);
+ }
+
+ const target* alias_rule::
+ filter (action, const target& t, const prerequisite& p) const
+ {
+ return &search (t, p);
}
recipe alias_rule::
@@ -68,17 +75,24 @@ namespace build2
// @@ Shouldn't we do match in parallel (here and below)?
//
auto& pts (t.prerequisite_targets[a]);
- for (prerequisite_member p: group_prerequisite_members (a, t))
+
+ auto pms (group_prerequisite_members (a, t, members_mode::never));
+ for (auto i (pms.begin ()), e (pms.end ()); i != e; ++i)
{
+ const prerequisite& p (i->prerequisite);
+
// Ignore unresolved targets that are imported from other projects.
// We are definitely not installing those.
//
- if (p.proj ())
+ if (p.proj)
continue;
// Let a customized rule have its say.
//
- const target* pt (filter (a, t, p));
+ // Note: we assume that if the filter enters the group, then it
+ // iterates over all its members.
+ //
+ const target* pt (filter (a, t, i));
if (pt == nullptr)
{
l5 ([&]{trace << "ignoring " << p << " (filtered out)";});
@@ -112,7 +126,14 @@ namespace build2
// group_rule
//
- const group_rule group_rule::instance;
+ const group_rule group_rule::instance (false /* see_through_only */);
+
+ bool group_rule::
+ match (action a, target& t, const string& h) const
+ {
+ return (!see_through || t.type ().see_through) &&
+ alias_rule::match (a, t, h);
+ }
const target* group_rule::
filter (action, const target&, const target& m) const
@@ -142,6 +163,7 @@ namespace build2
if (gv.members != nullptr)
{
auto& pts (t.prerequisite_targets[a]);
+
for (size_t i (0); i != gv.count; ++i)
{
const target* m (gv.members[i]);
@@ -194,9 +216,16 @@ namespace build2
}
const target* file_rule::
- filter (action, const target& t, prerequisite_member p) const
+ filter (action a, const target& t, prerequisite_iterator& i) const
+ {
+ assert (i->target == nullptr);
+ return filter (a, t, i->prerequisite);
+ }
+
+ const target* file_rule::
+ filter (action, const target& t, const prerequisite& p) const
{
- const target& pt (p.search (t));
+ const target& pt (search (t, p));
return pt.in (t.root_scope ()) ? &pt : nullptr;
}
@@ -220,21 +249,25 @@ namespace build2
// In both cases, the next step is to search, match, and collect all the
// installable prerequisites.
//
- // @@ Unconditional group? How does it work for cli? Change to maybe
- // same like test? If so, also in alias_rule.
- //
auto& pts (t.prerequisite_targets[a]);
- for (prerequisite_member p: group_prerequisite_members (a, t))
+
+ auto pms (group_prerequisite_members (a, t, members_mode::never));
+ for (auto i (pms.begin ()), e (pms.end ()); i != e; ++i)
{
+ const prerequisite& p (i->prerequisite);
+
// Ignore unresolved targets that are imported from other projects.
// We are definitely not installing those.
//
- if (p.proj ())
+ if (p.proj)
continue;
// Let a customized rule have its say.
//
- const target* pt (filter (a, t, p));
+ // Note: we assume that if the filter enters the group, then it
+ // iterates over all its members.
+ //
+ const target* pt (filter (a, t, i));
if (pt == nullptr)
{
l5 ([&]{trace << "ignoring " << p << " (filtered out)";});