diff options
author | Boris Kolpackov <boris@codesynthesis.com> | 2023-10-26 11:15:18 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Boris Kolpackov <boris@codesynthesis.com> | 2023-11-01 10:28:43 +0200 |
commit | 50f9844b8a97aa06edf09b6d8a538721a0cd24ea (patch) | |
tree | 9d3d008e18a147355d0a6798ad5de3d0a45a7d42 /libbuild2/install/rule.cxx | |
parent | ded8aa661b013f325aaab7267cf6cc811d6d94cb (diff) |
Use match options for runtime/buildtime distinction when installing libraries
Specifically, now, if a library is installed solely as a prerequisite of
an executable (potentially recursively), then only its runtime files are
installed omitting everything buildtime-related (static/import libraries,
non-versioned symlinks for shared libraries, pkg-config files, headers,
etc). If you are familiar with the runtime and -dev/-devel package splits
for libraries in Debian/Fedora, this is an analogous semantics.
Diffstat (limited to 'libbuild2/install/rule.cxx')
-rw-r--r-- | libbuild2/install/rule.cxx | 415 |
1 files changed, 322 insertions, 93 deletions
diff --git a/libbuild2/install/rule.cxx b/libbuild2/install/rule.cxx index 4dd11e8..29888ae 100644 --- a/libbuild2/install/rule.cxx +++ b/libbuild2/install/rule.cxx @@ -71,27 +71,45 @@ namespace build2 return true; } - const target* alias_rule:: + pair<const target*, uint64_t> alias_rule:: filter (const scope* is, - action a, const target& t, prerequisite_iterator& i) const + action a, const target& t, prerequisite_iterator& i, + match_extra& me) const { assert (i->member == nullptr); - return filter (is, a, t, i->prerequisite); + return filter (is, a, t, i->prerequisite, me); } - const target* alias_rule:: + pair<const target*, uint64_t> alias_rule:: filter (const scope* is, - action, const target& t, const prerequisite& p) const + action, const target& t, const prerequisite& p, + match_extra&) const { const target& pt (search (t, p)); - return is == nullptr || pt.in (*is) ? &pt : nullptr; + return make_pair (is == nullptr || pt.in (*is) ? &pt : nullptr, + match_extra::all_options); } recipe alias_rule:: - apply (action a, target& t) const + apply (action a, target& t, match_extra& me) const + { + return apply_impl (a, t, me); + } + + recipe alias_rule:: + apply (action, target&) const + { + assert (false); // Never called. + return nullptr; + } + + recipe alias_rule:: + apply_impl (action a, target& t, match_extra& me, bool reapply) const { tracer trace ("install::alias_rule::apply"); + assert (!reapply || a.operation () != update_id); + // Pass-through to our installable prerequisites. // // @@ Shouldn't we do match in parallel (here and below)? @@ -102,6 +120,8 @@ namespace build2 auto pms (group_prerequisite_members (a, t, members_mode::never)); for (auto i (pms.begin ()), e (pms.end ()); i != e; ++i) { + // NOTE: see essentially the same logic in reapply_impl() below. + // const prerequisite& p (i->prerequisite); // Ignore excluded. @@ -125,13 +145,17 @@ namespace build2 if (!is) is = a.operation () != update_id ? install_scope (t) : nullptr; - const target* pt (filter (*is, a, t, i)); + pair<const target*, uint64_t> fr (filter (*is, a, t, i, me)); + + const target* pt (fr.first); + uint64_t options (fr.second); + + lookup l; + if (pt == nullptr) { l5 ([&]{trace << "ignoring " << p << " (filtered out)";}); - continue; } - // Check if this prerequisite is explicitly "not installable", that // is, there is the 'install' variable and its value is false. // @@ -143,64 +167,108 @@ namespace build2 // // Note: not the same as lookup_install() above. // - auto l ((*pt)[var_install (*p.scope.root_scope ())]); - if (l && cast<path> (l).string () == "false") + else if ((l = (*pt)[var_install (*p.scope.root_scope ())]) && + cast<path> (l).string () == "false") { l5 ([&]{trace << "ignoring " << *pt << " (not installable)";}); - continue; + pt = nullptr; } - // If this is not a file-based target (e.g., a target group such as // libu{}) then ignore it if there is no rule to install. // - if (pt->is_a<file> ()) - match_sync (a, *pt); - else if (!try_match_sync (a, *pt).first) + else if (pt->is_a<file> ()) + { + match_sync (a, *pt, options); + } + else if (!try_match_sync (a, *pt, options).first) { l5 ([&]{trace << "ignoring " << *pt << " (no rule)";}); pt = nullptr; } - if (pt != nullptr) - pts.push_back (prerequisite_target (pt, pi)); + if (pt != nullptr || reapply) + { + // Use auxiliary data for a NULL entry to distinguish between + // filtered out (1) and ignored for other reasons (0). + // + pts.push_back ( + prerequisite_target (pt, pi, fr.first == nullptr ? 1 : 0)); + } } return default_recipe; } - // fsdir_rule - // - const fsdir_rule fsdir_rule::instance; - - bool fsdir_rule:: - match (action, target&) const + void alias_rule:: + reapply_impl (action a, target& t, match_extra& me) const { - // We always match. - // - // Note that we are called both as the outer part during the update-for- - // un/install pre-operation and as the inner part during the un/install - // operation itself. - // - return true; - } + tracer trace ("install::alias_rule::reapply"); - recipe fsdir_rule:: - apply (action a, target& t) const - { - // If this is outer part of the update-for-un/install, delegate to the - // default fsdir rule. Otherwise, this is a noop (we don't install - // fsdir{}). - // - // For now we also assume we don't need to do anything for prerequisites - // (the only sensible prerequisite of fsdir{} is another fsdir{}). + assert (a.operation () != update_id); + + optional<const scope*> is; + + // Iterate over prerequisites and prerequisite targets in parallel. // - if (a.operation () == update_id) + auto& pts (t.prerequisite_targets[a]); + size_t j (0), n (pts.size ()), en (0); + + auto pms (group_prerequisite_members (a, t, members_mode::never)); + for (auto i (pms.begin ()), e (pms.end ()); + i != e && j != n; + ++i, ++j, ++en) { - match_inner (a, t); - return inner_recipe; + // The same logic as in apply() above except that we skip + // prerequisites that were not filtered out. + // + const prerequisite& p (i->prerequisite); + + include_type pi (include (a, t, p)); + if (!pi) + continue; + + if (p.proj) + continue; + + prerequisite_target& pto (pts[j]); + + if (pto.target != nullptr || pto.data == 0) + continue; + + if (!is) + is = a.operation () != update_id ? install_scope (t) : nullptr; + + pair<const target*, uint64_t> fr (filter (*is, a, t, i, me)); + + const target* pt (fr.first); + uint64_t options (fr.second); + + lookup l; + + if (pt == nullptr) + { + l5 ([&]{trace << "ignoring " << p << " (filtered out)";}); + } + else if ((l = (*pt)[var_install (*p.scope.root_scope ())]) && + cast<path> (l).string () == "false") + { + l5 ([&]{trace << "ignoring " << *pt << " (not installable)";}); + pt = nullptr; + } + else if (pt->is_a<file> ()) + { + match_sync (a, *pt, options); + } + else if (!try_match_sync (a, *pt, options).first) + { + l5 ([&]{trace << "ignoring " << *pt << " (no rule)";}); + pt = nullptr; + } + + pto = prerequisite_target (pt, pi, fr.first == nullptr ? 1 : 0); } - else - return noop_recipe; + + assert (en == n); // Did not call apply() with true for reapply? } // group_rule @@ -214,16 +282,19 @@ namespace build2 alias_rule::match (a, t); } - const target* group_rule:: - filter (action, const target&, const target& m) const + bool group_rule:: + filter (action, const target&, const target&) const { - return &m; + return true; } - const target* group_rule:: + pair<const target*, uint64_t> group_rule:: filter (const scope* is, - action, const target& t, const prerequisite& p) const + action, const target& t, const prerequisite& p, + match_extra&) const { + pair<const target*, uint64_t> r (nullptr, match_extra::all_options); + // The same logic as in file_rule::filter() below. // if (p.is_a<exe> ()) @@ -232,15 +303,18 @@ namespace build2 if (p.vars.empty () || cast_empty<path> (p.vars[var_install (rs)]).string () != "true") - return nullptr; + return r; } const target& pt (search (t, p)); - return is == nullptr || pt.in (*is) ? &pt : nullptr; + if (is == nullptr || pt.in (*is)) + r.first = &pt; + + return r; } recipe group_rule:: - apply (action a, target& t) const + apply (action a, target& t, match_extra& me) const { tracer trace ("install::group_rule::apply"); @@ -265,17 +339,16 @@ namespace build2 auto& pts (t.prerequisite_targets[a]); for (size_t i (0); i != gv.count; ++i) { - const target* m (gv.members[i]); + const target* mt (gv.members[i]); - if (m == nullptr) + if (mt == nullptr) continue; // Let a customized rule have its say. // - const target* mt (filter (a, t, *m)); - if (mt == nullptr) + if (!filter (a, t, *mt)) { - l5 ([&]{trace << "ignoring " << *m << " (filtered out)";}); + l5 ([&]{trace << "ignoring " << *mt << " (filtered out)";}); continue; } @@ -298,7 +371,7 @@ namespace build2 // Delegate to the base rule. // - return alias_rule::apply (a, t); + return alias_rule::apply (a, t, me); } @@ -315,18 +388,28 @@ namespace build2 return true; } - const target* file_rule:: + bool file_rule:: + filter (action, const target&, const target&) const + { + return true; + } + + pair<const target*, uint64_t> file_rule:: filter (const scope* is, - action a, const target& t, prerequisite_iterator& i) const + action a, const target& t, prerequisite_iterator& i, + match_extra& me) const { assert (i->member == nullptr); - return filter (is, a, t, i->prerequisite); + return filter (is, a, t, i->prerequisite, me); } - const target* file_rule:: + pair<const target*, uint64_t> file_rule:: filter (const scope* is, - action, const target& t, const prerequisite& p) const + action, const target& t, const prerequisite& p, + match_extra&) const { + pair<const target*, uint64_t> r (nullptr, match_extra::all_options); + // See also group_rule::filter() with identical semantics. // if (p.is_a<exe> ()) @@ -340,25 +423,37 @@ namespace build2 // if (p.vars.empty () || cast_empty<path> (p.vars[var_install (rs)]).string () != "true") - return nullptr; + return r; } const target& pt (search (t, p)); - return is == nullptr || pt.in (*is) ? &pt : nullptr; + if (is == nullptr || pt.in (*is)) + r.first = &pt; + + return r; } recipe file_rule:: - apply (action a, target& t) const + apply (action a, target& t, match_extra& me) const { - recipe r (apply_impl (a, t)); + recipe r (apply_impl (a, t, me)); return r != nullptr ? move (r) : noop_recipe; } recipe file_rule:: - apply_impl (action a, target& t) const + apply (action, target&) const + { + assert (false); // Never called. + return nullptr; + } + + recipe file_rule:: + apply_impl (action a, target& t, match_extra& me, bool reapply) const { tracer trace ("install::file_rule::apply"); + assert (!reapply || a.operation () != update_id); + // Note that we are called both as the outer part during the update-for- // un/install pre-operation and as the inner part during the un/install // operation itself. @@ -415,6 +510,8 @@ namespace build2 auto pms (group_prerequisite_members (a, t, members_mode::never)); for (auto i (pms.begin ()), e (pms.end ()); i != e; ++i) { + // NOTE: see essentially the same logic in reapply_impl() below. + // const prerequisite& p (i->prerequisite); // Ignore excluded. @@ -438,27 +535,30 @@ namespace build2 if (!is) is = a.operation () != update_id ? install_scope (t) : nullptr; - const target* pt (filter (*is, a, t, i)); + pair<const target*, uint64_t> fr (filter (*is, a, t, i, me)); + + const target* pt (fr.first); + uint64_t options (fr.second); + + lookup l; if (pt == nullptr) { l5 ([&]{trace << "ignoring " << p << " (filtered out)";}); - continue; } - + // // See if we were explicitly instructed not to touch this target (the // same semantics as in alias_rule). // // Note: not the same as lookup_install() above. // - auto l ((*pt)[var_install (*p.scope.root_scope ())]); - if (l && cast<path> (l).string () == "false") + else if ((l = (*pt)[var_install (*p.scope.root_scope ())]) && + cast<path> (l).string () == "false") { l5 ([&]{trace << "ignoring " << *pt << " (not installable)";}); - continue; + pt = nullptr; } - - if (pt->is_a<file> ()) + else if (pt->is_a<file> ()) { // If the matched rule returned noop_recipe, then the target state // is set to unchanged as an optimization. Use this knowledge to @@ -466,17 +566,28 @@ namespace build2 // when updating static installable content (headers, documentation, // etc). // - if (match_sync (a, *pt, unmatch::unchanged).first) + // Regarding options, the expectation here is that they are not used + // for the update operation. And for install/uninstall, if they are + // used, then they don't effect whether the target is unchanged. All + // feels reasonable. + // + if (match_sync (a, *pt, unmatch::unchanged, options).first) pt = nullptr; } - else if (!try_match_sync (a, *pt).first) + else if (!try_match_sync (a, *pt, options).first) { l5 ([&]{trace << "ignoring " << *pt << " (no rule)";}); pt = nullptr; } - if (pt != nullptr) - pts.push_back (prerequisite_target (pt, pi)); + if (pt != nullptr || reapply) + { + // Use auxiliary data for a NULL entry to distinguish between + // filtered out (1) and ignored for other reasons (0). + // + pts.push_back ( + prerequisite_target (pt, pi, fr.first == nullptr ? 1 : 0)); + } } #if 1 @@ -502,6 +613,79 @@ namespace build2 } } + void file_rule:: + reapply_impl (action a, target& t, match_extra& me) const + { + tracer trace ("install::file_rule::reapply"); + + assert (a.operation () != update_id); + + optional<const scope*> is; + + // Iterate over prerequisites and prerequisite targets in parallel. + // + auto& pts (t.prerequisite_targets[a]); + size_t j (0), n (pts.size ()), en (0); + + auto pms (group_prerequisite_members (a, t, members_mode::never)); + for (auto i (pms.begin ()), e (pms.end ()); + i != e && j != n; + ++i, ++j, ++en) + { + // The same logic as in apply() above except that we skip + // prerequisites that were not filtered out. + // + const prerequisite& p (i->prerequisite); + + include_type pi (include (a, t, p)); + if (!pi) + continue; + + if (p.proj) + continue; + + prerequisite_target& pto (pts[j]); + + if (pto.target != nullptr || pto.data == 0) + continue; + + if (!is) + is = a.operation () != update_id ? install_scope (t) : nullptr; + + pair<const target*, uint64_t> fr (filter (*is, a, t, i, me)); + + const target* pt (fr.first); + uint64_t options (fr.second); + + lookup l; + + if (pt == nullptr) + { + l5 ([&]{trace << "ignoring " << p << " (filtered out)";}); + } + else if ((l = (*pt)[var_install (*p.scope.root_scope ())]) && + cast<path> (l).string () == "false") + { + l5 ([&]{trace << "ignoring " << *pt << " (not installable)";}); + pt = nullptr; + } + else if (pt->is_a<file> ()) + { + if (match_sync (a, *pt, unmatch::unchanged, options).first) + pt = nullptr; + } + else if (!try_match_sync (a, *pt, options).first) + { + l5 ([&]{trace << "ignoring " << *pt << " (no rule)";}); + pt = nullptr; + } + + pto = prerequisite_target (pt, pi, fr.first == nullptr ? 1 : 0); + } + + assert (en == n); // Did not call apply() with true for reapply? + } + target_state file_rule:: perform_update (action a, const target& t) { @@ -1160,6 +1344,8 @@ namespace build2 // target_state r (straight_execute_prerequisites (a, t)); + bool fr (filter (a, t, t)); + // Then installable ad hoc group members, if any. // for (const target* m (t.adhoc_member); @@ -1170,10 +1356,13 @@ namespace build2 { if (!mf->path ().empty () && mf->mtime () != timestamp_nonexistent) { - if (const path* p = lookup_install<path> (*mf, "install")) + if (filter (a, t, *mf)) { - install_target (*mf, *p, tp.empty () ? 1 : 2); - r |= target_state::changed; + if (const path* p = lookup_install<path> (*mf, "install")) + { + install_target (*mf, *p, !fr || tp.empty () ? 1 : 2); + r |= target_state::changed; + } } } } @@ -1182,7 +1371,7 @@ namespace build2 // Finally install the target itself (since we got here we know the // install variable is there). // - if (!tp.empty ()) + if (fr && !tp.empty ()) { install_target (t, cast<path> (t[var_install (rs)]), 1); r |= target_state::changed; @@ -1534,7 +1723,9 @@ namespace build2 // target_state r (target_state::unchanged); - if (!tp.empty ()) + bool fr (filter (a, t, t)); + + if (fr && !tp.empty ()) r |= uninstall_target (t, cast<path> (t[var_install (rs)]), 1); // Then installable ad hoc group members, if any. To be anally precise, @@ -1549,12 +1740,15 @@ namespace build2 { if (!mf->path ().empty () && mf->mtime () != timestamp_nonexistent) { - if (const path* p = lookup_install<path> (*m, "install")) + if (filter (a, t, *mf)) { - r |= uninstall_target ( - *mf, - *p, - tp.empty () || r != target_state::changed ? 1 : 2); + if (const path* p = lookup_install<path> (*m, "install")) + { + r |= uninstall_target ( + *mf, + *p, + !fr || tp.empty () || r != target_state::changed ? 1 : 2); + } } } } @@ -1566,5 +1760,40 @@ namespace build2 return r; } + + // fsdir_rule + // + const fsdir_rule fsdir_rule::instance; + + bool fsdir_rule:: + match (action, target&) const + { + // We always match. + // + // Note that we are called both as the outer part during the update-for- + // un/install pre-operation and as the inner part during the un/install + // operation itself. + // + return true; + } + + recipe fsdir_rule:: + apply (action a, target& t) const + { + // If this is outer part of the update-for-un/install, delegate to the + // default fsdir rule. Otherwise, this is a noop (we don't install + // fsdir{}). + // + // For now we also assume we don't need to do anything for prerequisites + // (the only sensible prerequisite of fsdir{} is another fsdir{}). + // + if (a.operation () == update_id) + { + match_inner (a, t); + return inner_recipe; + } + else + return noop_recipe; + } } } |