diff options
-rw-r--r-- | build2/algorithm.cxx | 2 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | build2/algorithm.hxx | 3 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | build2/algorithm.ixx | 5 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | build2/cc/link-rule.cxx | 10 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | build2/target.hxx | 2 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | build2/target.ixx | 2 |
6 files changed, 13 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/build2/algorithm.cxx b/build2/algorithm.cxx index fc72d74..cb38905 100644 --- a/build2/algorithm.cxx +++ b/build2/algorithm.cxx @@ -1487,7 +1487,7 @@ namespace build2 // requirement: if we are delegating to the group, we need to find a // recipe for it, just like we would for a prerequisite. // - // Note that below we are going to treat the group state to postponed. + // Note that we are also going to treat the group state as postponed. // This is not a mistake: until we execute the recipe, we want to keep // returning postponed. And once the recipe is executed, it will reset the // state to group (see group_action()). To put it another way, the diff --git a/build2/algorithm.hxx b/build2/algorithm.hxx index f1ac135..5f0854f 100644 --- a/build2/algorithm.hxx +++ b/build2/algorithm.hxx @@ -266,7 +266,8 @@ namespace build2 size_t start_count, atomic_count& task_count, bool fail = true); - // Match by specifying the recipe directly. The target must be locked. + // Match by specifying the recipe directly and without incrementing the + // dependency counts. The target must be locked. // void match_recipe (target_lock&, recipe); diff --git a/build2/algorithm.ixx b/build2/algorithm.ixx index 0b3a23e..a01ee58 100644 --- a/build2/algorithm.ixx +++ b/build2/algorithm.ixx @@ -376,9 +376,8 @@ namespace build2 // This gets tricky when we start considering direct execution, etc. So // here seems like the best place to do it. // - // We also ignore the group recipe since it is used for ad hoc groups - // (which are not executed). Plus, group action means real recipe is in - // the group so this also feels right conceptually. + // We also ignore the group recipe since group action means real recipe + // is in the group and so this feels right conceptually. // // We also avoid incrementing this count twice for the same target if we // have both the inner and outer operations. In our model the outer diff --git a/build2/cc/link-rule.cxx b/build2/cc/link-rule.cxx index f3fbaad..b873e40 100644 --- a/build2/cc/link-rule.cxx +++ b/build2/cc/link-rule.cxx @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ namespace build2 // that X could be C (as in language). We handle this by always checking // for X first. // - // Note also that we treat bmi{} as obj{}. + // Note also that we treat bmi{} as obj{}. @@ MODHDR hbmi{}? // bool seen_x (false), seen_c (false), seen_obj (false), seen_lib (false); @@ -576,6 +576,8 @@ namespace build2 continue; } + // @@ MODHDR: hbmix{} has no objx{} + // binless = binless && !(pt->is_a<objx> () || pt->is_a<bmix> ()); m = 3; @@ -1260,7 +1262,7 @@ namespace build2 if (modules) { - if (pt->is_a<bmix> ()) + if (pt->is_a<bmix> ()) // @@ MODHDR: hbmix{} has no objx{} pt = pt->member; } @@ -2053,7 +2055,7 @@ namespace build2 // if (modules) { - if (pt->is_a<bmix> ()) + if (pt->is_a<bmix> ()) // @@ MODHDR: hbmix{} has no objx{} pt = pt->member; } @@ -2360,7 +2362,7 @@ namespace build2 if (modules) { - if (pt->is_a<bmix> ()) + if (pt->is_a<bmix> ()) // @@ MODHDR: hbmix{} has no objx{} pt = pt->member; } diff --git a/build2/target.hxx b/build2/target.hxx index a86a8be..e167211 100644 --- a/build2/target.hxx +++ b/build2/target.hxx @@ -619,7 +619,7 @@ namespace build2 // matched. // bool - group_state (action a) const; + group_state (action) const; public: // Targets to which prerequisites resolve for this action. Note that diff --git a/build2/target.ixx b/build2/target.ixx index dcbea32..a2be81c 100644 --- a/build2/target.ixx +++ b/build2/target.ixx @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ namespace build2 { // We go an extra step and short-circuit to the target state even if the // raw state is not group provided the recipe is group_recipe and the - // state is unknown (see mtime() for some ideas on why we do it). + // state is unknown (see mtime() for a discussion on why we do it). // const opstate& s (state[a]); |