aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
-rw-r--r--build2/algorithm.cxx4
-rw-r--r--build2/cc/link-rule.cxx4
-rw-r--r--build2/install/rule.cxx14
-rw-r--r--build2/operation.hxx45
-rw-r--r--build2/target.hxx2
-rw-r--r--build2/test/rule.cxx10
6 files changed, 49 insertions, 30 deletions
diff --git a/build2/algorithm.cxx b/build2/algorithm.cxx
index 58ddb24..d39711b 100644
--- a/build2/algorithm.cxx
+++ b/build2/algorithm.cxx
@@ -222,10 +222,10 @@ namespace build2
const rule_match*
match_impl (action a, target& t, const rule* skip, bool try_match)
{
- // If this is an outer operation (Y_for_X), then we look for rules
+ // If this is an outer operation (Y-for-X), then we look for rules
// registered for the outer id (X). Note that we still pass the original
// action to the rule's match() function so that it can distinguish
- // between a pre/post operation (Y_for_X) and the actual operation (X).
+ // between a pre/post operation (Y-for-X) and the actual operation (X).
//
meta_operation_id mo (a.meta_operation ());
operation_id o (a.inner () ? a.operation () : a.outer_operation ());
diff --git a/build2/cc/link-rule.cxx b/build2/cc/link-rule.cxx
index b6b707d..cd355c6 100644
--- a/build2/cc/link-rule.cxx
+++ b/build2/cc/link-rule.cxx
@@ -290,7 +290,7 @@ namespace build2
file& t (xt.as<file> ());
- // Note that for_install is signalled by install_rule and therefore
+ // Note that for-install is signalled by install_rule and therefore
// can only be relied upon during execute.
//
match_data& md (t.data (match_data ()));
@@ -449,7 +449,7 @@ namespace build2
//
// Note that we do it here regardless of whether we are installing
// or not for two reasons. Firstly, it is not easy to detect this
- // situation in apply() since the for_install hasn't yet been
+ // situation in apply() since the for-install hasn't yet been
// communicated by install_rule. Secondly, always having the member
// takes care of cleanup automagically. The actual generation
// happens in perform_update() below.
diff --git a/build2/install/rule.cxx b/build2/install/rule.cxx
index 8bf58aa..00166c2 100644
--- a/build2/install/rule.cxx
+++ b/build2/install/rule.cxx
@@ -45,9 +45,9 @@ namespace build2
{
// We always match.
//
- // Note that we are called both as the outer part during the "update for
- // un/install" pre-operation and as the inner part during the
- // un/install operation itself.
+ // Note that we are called both as the outer part during the update-for-
+ // un/install pre-operation and as the inner part during the un/install
+ // operation itself.
//
return true;
}
@@ -234,12 +234,12 @@ namespace build2
{
tracer trace ("install::file_rule::apply");
- // Note that we are called both as the outer part during the "update for
- // un/install" pre-operation and as the inner part during the
- // un/install operation itself.
+ // Note that we are called both as the outer part during the update-for-
+ // un/install pre-operation and as the inner part during the un/install
+ // operation itself.
//
// In both cases we first determine if the target is installable and
- // return noop if it's not. Otherwise, in the first case (update for
+ // return noop if it's not. Otherwise, in the first case (update-for-
// un/install) we delegate to the normal update and in the second
// (un/install) -- perform the test.
//
diff --git a/build2/operation.hxx b/build2/operation.hxx
index 7f59783..3f812d5 100644
--- a/build2/operation.hxx
+++ b/build2/operation.hxx
@@ -34,19 +34,38 @@ namespace build2
using operation_id = uint8_t;
using action_id = uint8_t;
- // Meta-operations and operations are not the end of the story. We
- // also have operation nesting (currently only one level deep) which
- // is used to implement pre/post operations (currently, but may be
- // useful for other things). Here is the idea: the test operation
- // needs to make sure that the targets that it needs to test are
- // up-to-date. So it runs update as its pre-operation. It is almost
- // like an ordinary update except that it has test as its outer
- // operation (the meta-operations are always the same). This way a
- // rule can recognize that this is "update for test" and do something
- // differently. For example, if an executable is not a test, then
- // there is no use updating it. At the same time, most rules will
- // ignore the fact that this is a nested update and for them it is
- // "update as usual".
+ // Meta-operations and operations are not the end of the story. We also have
+ // operation nesting (currently only one level deep) which is used to
+ // implement pre/post operations (currently, but may be useful for other
+ // things). Here is the idea: the test operation needs to make sure that the
+ // targets that it needs to test are up-to-date. So it runs update as its
+ // pre-operation. It is almost like an ordinary update except that it has
+ // test as its outer operation (the meta-operations are always the same).
+ // This way a rule can recognize that this is "update for test" and do
+ // something differently. For example, if an executable is not a test, then
+ // there is no use updating it. At the same time, most rules will ignore the
+ // fact that this is a nested update and for them it is "update as usual".
+ //
+ // This inner/outer operation support is implemented by maintaining two
+ // independent "target states" (see target::state; initially we tried to do
+ // it via rule/recipe override but that didn't end up well, to put it
+ // mildly). While the outer operation normally "directs" the inner, inner
+ // rules can still be matched/executed directly, without outer's involvement
+ // (e.g., because of other inner rules). A typical implementation of an
+ // outer rule either returns noop or delegates to the inner rule. In
+ // particular, it should not replace or override the inner's logic.
+ //
+ // While most of the relevant target state is duplicated, certain things are
+ // shared among the inner/outer rules, such as the target data pad and the
+ // group state. In particular, it is assumed the group state is always
+ // determined by the inner rule (see resolve_group_members()).
+ //
+ // Normally, an outer rule will be responsible for any additional, outer
+ // operation-specific work. Sometimes, however, the inner rule needs to
+ // customize its behavior. In this case the outer and inner rules must
+ // communicate this explicitly (normally via the target's data pad) and
+ // there is a number of restrictions to this approach. See
+ // cc::{link,install}_rule for details.
//
struct action
{
diff --git a/build2/target.hxx b/build2/target.hxx
index 405bf4f..23213a2 100644
--- a/build2/target.hxx
+++ b/build2/target.hxx
@@ -441,7 +441,7 @@ namespace build2
static size_t count_executed () {return offset_executed + count_base ();}
static size_t count_busy () {return offset_busy + count_base ();}
- // Inner/outer operation state.
+ // Inner/outer operation state. See operation.hxx for details.
//
struct opstate
{
diff --git a/build2/test/rule.cxx b/build2/test/rule.cxx
index a42ceca..7f6a133 100644
--- a/build2/test/rule.cxx
+++ b/build2/test/rule.cxx
@@ -35,8 +35,8 @@ namespace build2
recipe rule::
apply (action a, target& t) const
{
- // Note that we are called both as the outer part during the "update for
- // test" pre-operation and as the inner part during the test operation
+ // Note that we are called both as the outer part during the update-for-
+ // test pre-operation and as the inner part during the test operation
// itself.
//
// In both cases we first determine if the target is testable and return
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ namespace build2
//
// test'able | pass'able | neither
// | |
- // update for test delegate (& pass) | pass | noop
+ // update-for-test delegate (& pass) | pass | noop
// ---------------------------------------+-------------+---------
// test test (& pass) | pass | noop
//
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ namespace build2
// execute them relying on update to assign their paths.
//
// Causing update for test inputs/scripts is tricky: we cannot
- // match for update_for_install because this same rule will match
+ // match for update-for-install because this same rule will match
// and since the target is not testable, it will return the noop
// recipe.
//
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ namespace build2
// iffy, it does make sense: the outer rule we would have matched
// would have simply delegated to the inner so we might as well
// take a shortcut. The only potential drawback of this approach
- // is that we won't be able to provide any for_test customizations
+ // is that we won't be able to provide any for-test customizations
// when updating test inputs/scripts. But such a need seems rather
// far fetched.
//