From d1d28c5f261e39013b8b987d58b3c0acaa8c762b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Boris Kolpackov <boris@codesynthesis.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 07:54:57 +0200
Subject: Use buildfile{} instead of build{} for target type

This feels like an oversight from transitioning to full names, like
testscript{}, etc.
---
 doc/manual.cli       | 2 +-
 libbuild2/target.cxx | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/manual.cli b/doc/manual.cli
index 9f9dee6..c0ae061 100644
--- a/doc/manual.cli
+++ b/doc/manual.cli
@@ -4190,7 +4190,7 @@ buildfile:5:1: dump:
     [dir_path] out_base = /tmp/hello/hello/
     [dir_path] src_base = /tmp/hello/hello/
 
-    build{buildfile.}:
+    buildfile{buildfile.}:
 
     exe{hello.?}: cxx{hello.?}
   }
diff --git a/libbuild2/target.cxx b/libbuild2/target.cxx
index e3ad367..a543f34 100644
--- a/libbuild2/target.cxx
+++ b/libbuild2/target.cxx
@@ -1215,7 +1215,7 @@ namespace build2
 
   const target_type buildfile::static_type
   {
-    "build",
+    "buildfile",
     &file::static_type,
     &target_factory<buildfile>,
     &buildfile_target_extension,
-- 
cgit v1.1