From ff8ed209cd80799199e0b2e3d37213d549bc342f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Boris Kolpackov <boris@codesynthesis.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 10:10:13 +0200
Subject: Don't treat mxx{} as cc-source

If we do it, then the link rule will refuse to match when modules are
disabled (in which case mxx{} should be treated as a header).
---
 build2/cxx/target.cxx | 2 +-
 build2/cxx/target.hxx | 6 +++---
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/build2/cxx/target.cxx b/build2/cxx/target.cxx
index 5641e7a..bde41fc 100644
--- a/build2/cxx/target.cxx
+++ b/build2/cxx/target.cxx
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ namespace build2
     const target_type mxx::static_type
     {
       "mxx",
-      &cc::static_type,
+      &file::static_type,
       &target_factory<mxx>,
       &target_extension_var<ext_var, mxx_ext_def>,
       &target_pattern_var<ext_var, mxx_ext_def>,
diff --git a/build2/cxx/target.hxx b/build2/cxx/target.hxx
index f5591d1..ff1d077 100644
--- a/build2/cxx/target.hxx
+++ b/build2/cxx/target.hxx
@@ -61,12 +61,12 @@ namespace build2
     // The module interface unit is both like a header (e.g., we need to
     // install it) and like a source (we need to compile it). Plus, to
     // support dual use (modules/headers) it could actually be #include'd
-    // (and in both cases).
+    // (and even in both cases).
     //
-    class mxx: public cc::cc
+    class mxx: public file
     {
     public:
-      using cc::cc;
+      using file::file;
 
     public:
       static const target_type static_type;
-- 
cgit v1.1