From 779b8cf010210a68a80819ebba9157aeb7a07c64 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Boris Kolpackov Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2020 14:27:16 +0200 Subject: Proofreading fixes to manual --- doc/manual.cli | 22 +++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) (limited to 'doc/manual.cli') diff --git a/doc/manual.cli b/doc/manual.cli index 8821771..ca57199 100644 --- a/doc/manual.cli +++ b/doc/manual.cli @@ -4385,7 +4385,7 @@ Configuration Report} where we extract the GCC plugin directory while dealing with the possibility of it Bunin configured without plugin support.| Before we delve into the technical details, let's discuss the overall need for -project configurability. While it may seem that making ones project more +project configurability. While it may seem that making one's project more user-configurable is always a good idea, there are costs: by having a choice we increase the complexity and open the door for potential incompatibility. Specifically, we may end up with two projects in the same build needing a @@ -4480,7 +4480,7 @@ variable names in order to avoid clashes. The build system core reserves \c{build} and \c{import} as the second component in configuration variables as well as \c{configured} as the third -and further components.| +and subsequent components.| \h#proj-config-directive|\c{config} Directive| @@ -4496,7 +4496,7 @@ config [string] config.libhello.greeting ?= 'Hello' \ \N|The irony does not escape us: these configuration variables are exactly of -the kind that we advocate against. However, finding reasonable example of +the kind that we advocate against. However, finding a reasonable example of build-time configurability in a \i{\"Hello, World!\"} library is not easy. In fact, it probably shouldn't have any. So, for this chapter, do as we say, not as we do.| @@ -4522,9 +4522,9 @@ After the attribute list we have the variable name. The \c{config} directive will validate that it matches the \c{config[.**]..**} pattern (with one exception discussed in \l{#proj-config-report Configuration Report}). -Finally, after the variable name comes optional default value. Note that -unlike normal variables, default value assignment (\c{?=}) is the only valid -form of assignment in the \c{config} directive. +Finally, after the variable name comes the optional default value. Note that +unlike normal variables, the default value assignment (\c{?=}) is the only +valid form of assignment in the \c{config} directive. The semantics of the \c{config} directive is as follows: First an overridable variable is entered with the specified name, type (if any), and global @@ -4539,7 +4539,7 @@ Note also that if the configuration value is not specified by the user and you haven't provided the default, the variable will be undefined, not \c{null}, and, as a result, omitted from the persistent configuration (\c{build/config.build} file). However, \c{null} is a valid default value. It -is is traditionally used for \i{optional} configuration values. For example: +is traditionally used for \i{optional} configuration values. For example: \ config [string] config.libhello.fallback_name ?= [null] @@ -4598,8 +4598,8 @@ if ($config.libhello.database == [null]) \ If computing the default value is expensive or requires elaborate logic, then -handling of a configuration variable can be broken down into two steps along -these lines: +the handling of a configuration variable can be broken down into two steps +along these lines: \ config [string] config.libhello.greeting @@ -4709,7 +4709,7 @@ this topic is discussed further in One of the effects of the \c{config} directive is to mark a defined configuration variable for reporting. The project configuration report is -printed automatically at the sufficiently high verbosity level along with the +printed automatically at a sufficiently high verbosity level along with the build system module configuration. For example (some of the \c{cxx} module configuration is omitted for brevity): @@ -4994,7 +4994,7 @@ void say_hello (ostream& o, const string& n) \N|Note that with \c{if\ constexpr} the branch not taken must still be valid, parsable code. This is both one of the main benefits of using it instead of \c{#if} (the code we are not using is still guaranteed to be syntactically -correct) as well as its main drawbacks (it cannot be used, for example, for +correct) as well as its main drawback (it cannot be used, for example, for platform-specific code without extra efforts, such as providing shims for missing declarations, etc).| -- cgit v1.1